JULIAN REVIEW COPY · Proposed scope and commercial terms · October 1, 2026 · Not a final agreement
Prepared for Forno Street Pizza Co
John Humphrey × The Wizard of AI / AI Acrobatics

From Meta lead to a
prepared sales appointment.

A clear investor website, John’s 12-minute presentation and a connected engagement system prepare prospects for a useful human consultation. GoHighLevel stays central; the custom workspace carries questions and context forward.

THE 60-SECOND SCOPE

Investor story → John’s presentation → phone or questions → a prepared human appointment. Preserve context in GHL and give the closer a versioned brief.

One offer. A tailored build.Built around GoHighLevel.
FORNO / ENGAGEMENT DESKILLUSTRATIVE

Your leads, in context.

Custom intelligence. GHL stays central.

Preview
NEW LEADIntake
NEXT STEPPrepare
TEAM ACTIONReview
A clear next action for every conversation
AL
Alex · sample lead

Asked about the first call · overview shared

Preparing
SM
Sam · sample lead

Appointment read back · closer brief ready

Booked
JR
Jordan · sample lead

Question needs John’s review · AI paused

Handoff
✦
The conversation carries forward.

Phone questions, relevant follow-up and the closer’s brief connect to one lead record.

Concept design · fictional records · proposed dashboard, not a live system

Approved knowledge

A dated offer pack, approved tone and clear human boundaries.

John’s current content approval comes first.
Coordinated dialogue

Phone and messages carry the same question and next step.

One sender owner, consent and stop controls.
Closer-ready context

A real booking, useful preparation and unanswered questions.

The human team handles current investment decisions.
The opportunity

Close the gap between
“I’m interested” and “I’m ready.”

The meeting pointed to three places where a timely, informed conversation can support your existing funnel. The pilot will measure the result.

01 / ENGAGE WHILE INTEREST IS FRESH

Give the lead a conversation.

A form submission captures interest. A helpful phone conversation can answer the next question without adding a new app or microphone flow.

“giving people a chance to call in immediately after opting in is a huge.”CJ · Oct 1, 00:24 · meeting reference
02 / MAKE THE NEXT TOUCH RELEVANT

Remember what they asked.

Carry the questions and agreed next step into concise messages. Use John’s approved tone and let your team take over when needed.

“take the feedback, maybe the questions that they asked”CJ · Oct 1, 10:27 · meeting reference
03 / PREPARE FOR THE SALES CALL

Help them arrive informed.

Coordinate booking, approved education and unanswered questions. Give the closer a useful brief rather than a cold appointment.

“we don't want people showing up blind.”John · Oct 1, 33:34 · meeting reference

The JuliBoop patterns, customized for your offer.

The CRM demo provides the reference: linked context, approved tone, conversation memory, human review and operational visibility. This build adapts those patterns into an offer-specific engagement layer. Native GHL may provide the runtime; custom work addresses the source governance, context and operator gaps proven by tests.

GoHighLevel remains the team’s working CRM.One dated, approved offer pack; distinct historical sources.A custom dashboard for context and intervention.The scope ends at the attended human appointment.
A new, separate deliverable

An investor front door
built around the consultation.

A bespoke website presents one clear opportunity before the secure investor process. Avestor remains the destination for documents, verification, signatures and funding.

Expanded website scope · price TBD

From a long offering page
to a clear investor story.

Bring John’s 12:08 presentation forward, make the fund/operator roles and process readable, and give prospects a respectful question-first or consultation-first next step.

Current offer→John’s presentation→Clear structure→Human consultation
Review the Forno working branding guide

Pizza-derived red, ink black and white, informed by observed company materials. Forno Street Pizza Co is the chosen review brand. Final offer facts and asset approval remain part of the launch review.

The review prototype uses explicit placeholders where approved offer facts or assets are still needed. It does not connect live GHL booking, collect an investment commitment or replace Avestor.

INVESTOR STORY / REVIEW
A CLEARER FRONT DOOR
Understand the opportunity.
Prepare for the conversation.
Watch John’s presentation12:08 · intended pre-frame
FundOperatorConsultation
Concept illustration · no fabricated property or return evidence
John’s intended pre-frame · 12:08

Put the right story
before the consultation.

The Fast Fired Phase 2 Presentation by John Humphrey connects the opportunity, operating structure and next human conversation. Make it prominent, readable and useful in the new investor journey.

Fast Fired Phase 2 Presentation · John Humphrey · 12:08

The intended asset, listed in an April 22, 2026 page update. Recording date is not independently established.

Open the intended presentation
What preparation should accomplish

Clarify the roles.
Explain the structure.
Make the next call useful.

John’s presentation explains a fund-led, corporate-operated process and closes with a 20–30-minute consultation. The website and assistant should carry that same story forward.

  1. One coherent opportunity. Show the approved fund, operating team and retail-setting roles in clear text alongside the video.
  2. A readable process. Explain the three stages and location paths using the owner-approved current definitions.
  3. Questions carried to a human. Keep location preferences and unresolved terms in the closer brief; formal verification and decisions stay with the team.
Offer three useful paths: review first, ask a question, or book now. The appointment remains available without a video-completion hurdle.

A topic guide for the 12-minute presentation.

Select a topic for its role in preparation. Times identify the source excerpt; playback uses the video’s own controls.

Approved chapters · proposed

The speaker describes corporate operation, a dedicated store LLC, fund reporting and portal distributions. Explain approved roles clearly without presenting an owner-operated franchise purchase.

Question to preserveWho runs the store, and how are roles and reporting defined?

Optional self-report: not started, part watched, finished or questions. Verified playback, if implemented later, is a separate signal. Neither establishes understanding or qualification; non-viewing never automatically cancels the appointment.

Current offer approval

One approved source pack across website, video and AI.

Use Forno Street Pizza Co for this proposal. The historical Fast Fired source title remains intact; reconcile offer terms and source versions before client launch.

Source / versionUseConfirm with the owner
Supplied Avestor / Forno page ↗Existing investor portal and source documents.Forno offer identity, minimum, eligibility, approved financial model and current status.
John’s intended 12:08 presentation · April 22, 2026 updatePrimary pre-frame and consultation story.Current phase, availability, rate definitions and approved examples; recording date remains unknown.
26:32 Benjamin Nasberg interviewHistorical background only; not the intended pre-frame.Keep its earlier corporate/fund/store claims separate.
Oct 1, 2026 meetingEngagement objective, preferences and original core-scope discussion.Current offer pack, expanded website scope and final SOW.
Source-backed answers. Each answer has an offer/version, date and approver. Conflicting or retired facts are withheld; the question and source version go to the human. Eligibility, suitability, allocation and commitments remain with the authorized process.
Walk through the experience

From a form submission
to a prepared sales conversation.

Follow fictional Alex from a phone question through contextual text, a simulated booking and a closer brief. Approved source versions, consent and human judgment govern the real build.

Same fictional prospect

Alex / one connected thread

Entry
Eligible Meta opt-in → inbound phone
Question carried forward
Who operates the business? Which locations are currently available near me?
Source
Current approved offer pack and John’s12:08 presentation; historical sources remain separate.
Next step
Requested operator overview and a human conversation
Conversation owner
Assistant / approved acquisition scope
ALEX / CONNECTED PROSPECT JOURNEYILLUSTRATIVE DEMO
SIMULATED PHONE CONVERSATION

Start with Alex's real question.

ALEXBefore I book, who operates the restaurant? And can I ask about a location near me?
AI SALES ASSISTANTHi Alex, I'm the AI assistant for John's sales team. The approved overview explains the operator's role. I'll ask John to confirm the location details for the offer you're considering. Would you like that section by text?
Fictional Alex · question saved: who operates / location preference · approved pack required

Fictional Alex, scripts, slots and status. These controls simulate the proposed journey; no message is sent, calendar booked or live account tested.

Your custom system

Eight connected parts.
One coherent journey.

Purpose-built responsibilities for one approved offer. Validate native GHL capabilities against these jobs; implement custom parts only where the agreed scenarios show a need.

Instant lead engagement

An eligible Meta opt-in keeps its source and answers in GHL, with a tested phone entry point while interest is fresh.

“I'd want to be able to hit the click to call button.”CJ · Oct 1, 02:03 · meeting reference

John's sales brain

A dated, client-approved offer pack governs answers. Older recordings remain separately labeled; conflicting facts are blocked and routed to the team.

“We have tons of Zoom calls that I've done with clients over the last nine months.”John · Oct 1, 13:21 · meeting reference

Approved voice & tone

Brief, natural conversations and channel-specific writing based on approved examples, with a clear assistant introduction.

“That's my biggest worry is that people are getting turned off by it.”CJ · Oct 1, 11:02 · meeting reference

Conversation memory

Carry questions, preferences and next steps from phone to text or email. Follow-up refers to what the prospect actually said.

“take the feedback, maybe the questions that they asked”CJ · Oct 1, 10:27 · meeting reference

GoHighLevel coordination

Keep your team's contacts, inbox, pipeline and calendars central. Validate native AI first; add tailored source governance, context and visibility where representative tests prove a gap.

“we're pretty well ingrained.”CJ · Oct 1, 20:30 · meeting reference

Booking & preparation

Offer real closer availability, book once, confirm the correct slot, and prepare the prospect and closer with useful context.

“we don't want people showing up blind.”John · Oct 1, 33:34 · meeting reference

Human handoff

The assistant handles approved first conversations, including overnight inbound calls. Questions needing judgment route to your sales team.

“it could be in the middle of the night.”John · Oct 1, 22:51 · meeting reference

Custom operator dashboard

A JuliBoop-inspired view of lead readiness, conversations, exceptions, handoffs and funnel events, adapted to this one offer.

“prove this out with this one offer that we have with Fast Fired.”John · Oct 1, 30:07 · meeting reference
Native GHL first · prove the custom gap

Use the simplest setup
that passes the journey.

HighLevel documents inbound Voice AI, knowledge-backed answers and appointment booking, plus Conversation AI booking. Test these capabilities in John’s actual location before choosing the runtime or final custom backend scope.

JobDocumented native pathTailored work if a gap is provenSame scenario gate
First conversation & bookingHighLevel Voice AI / Conversation AI and calendars.Custom voice/tool orchestration only if approved scenarios cannot be satisfied by configuration.Known/unknown caller; supported/unknown answer; valid closer slot, once-only booking and readback.
Current approved factsKnowledge configuration is part of the native AI setup.Dated source registry, conflicting-fact blocks and approved offer-pack governance.Current versus retired sources, conflicting eligibility/minimum and human answer escalation.
Phone-to-message continuityConfigured GHL conversations and workflows.Linked cross-channel memory and tailored follow-up where observed continuity gaps remain.Alex’s exact question and next step persist; replies/pause/takeover stop conflicting touches.
Preparation & closer contextExisting confirmations and approved message workflows.Relevant optional chapters, readiness context and a versioned closer brief.Requested resource, unresolved question, correct appointment and human ownership are visible.
Team control & reliabilityGHL inbox, pipeline, ownership and available reporting.Operator visibility or tailored exception controls for gaps demonstrated in the test set.Consent/DND, takeover suppression, deduplicated retries, failure visibility and receipt reconciliation.

The buying rationale is the complete journey.

Corpus approval, tone review, coordinated conversations and closer-ready context are the proposed responsibilities. Native AI can supply the runtime; custom source governance and operator experience remain candidates until tests establish what John needs.

Document a failed scenario and the exact work to close it before settling custom runtime/provider cost. Passing a scripted set does not establish universal reliability.

“we're pretty well ingrained.”CJ · Oct 1, 20:30 · meeting reference

GHL stays authoritative.

  • Keep contacts, inbox, pipeline and closer calendars in the designated client location.
  • Inventory native AI/reminders and agree one message owner.
  • Check consent/DND and takeover immediately before sending.
  • Verify event intake, retries/deduplication, booking readback and receipts.
  • Route conflicting/current investment questions with source version to a human.
Account gate: test actual mobile Meta entry, client-owned number, identity match, provider setup, calendar routing, source version, consent and human handoff in John’s location. Official documentation is feasibility evidence; no account configuration, native limitation or operational result is asserted.
Built around your questions

From conversation
to a confirmed appointment.

The October 6 review shaped the design: fresh availability, one booking per request, context across calls, natural answers and a clear route to a person.

Follow the workflow

  1. Lead enters GHL with source and consent. Check opt-out and human ownership before any automated contact.
  2. Resolve the correct contact and recent notes. Introduce the AI, listen, and answer approved questions.
  3. If a consultation is useful, ask permission, confirm the timezone and read fresh round-robin availability.
  4. Recheck the selected slot and submit one booking request. Confirm only a verified appointment; a taken slot gets fresh options.
  5. If a request times out, check its original result before retrying. Repeated problems route to a person.
  6. Save the question, outcome and appointment to the same contact. Prepare the closer; stop automation on opt-out or takeover.

Test the conversation now

Choose setter or appointment-confirmation mode → preview one of six voices → select turn timing and wording → talk over the browser WebSocket → review the transcript and simulated result.

Confirmation mode checks a fictional appointment, offers the presentation and helps the prospect bring a useful question to the meeting. It can also rehearse rescheduling or cancellation.

In the team demo, GHL and calendar steps are simulated. Telephone calling and live CRM integration are deferred. The diagram’s rollout cards describe the later implementation, after this conversation is approved.

Booking that recovers

Read the Fast Fire Discovery Call calendar, confirm the timezone, revalidate the selected slot, then book once. Conflicts get fresh options; uncertain results are reconciled before retrying.

Conversation with continuity

Answer every question before inviting a booking. Retrieve recent notes by verified GHL contact ID, respect interruptions, and let a person take over with the relevant context.

A measured rollout

Approve the script and consent flow, test the existing calendar in a sandbox, then run a small approved pilot. Measure actual provider costs and voice latency before scaling.

The team demo uses fictional prospects and simulated appointments. Production calendar, phone and CRM integrations remain implementation work.

Try the Forno voice demo ↗
The architecture

See how the system
works together.

Four original responsibility maps show the investor website, prospect journey, approved intelligence and operations. Runtime choices follow the native/custom fit gate. Expand a diagram or open its Whimsical board for a closer look.

01 / Investor website → CRM → human investor process

John’s 12:08 presentation connects the investor front door, GHL and custom workspace, human consultation and existing Avestor process. The approved offer library ties them together.

Investor website12:08 + questionsGoHighLevelContact + calendarCustom workspaceContext + approvalHuman consultationQuestions + decisionsAvestor portalDocuments + fundingApproved offer/version context connects the site, conversations and human handoff
Local architecture illustration · Whimsical embed is not configured for this view.

02 / From Meta interest to an informed appointment

How capture, conversation, follow-up and calendar coordination connect.

Meta lead formApproved answersGoHighLevelContact + sourceAI conversationPhone + memoryContextual nurtureSMS / emailCloser calendarBook + prepareReplies, preparation and human handoff stay linked to the lead
Local architecture illustration · Whimsical embed is not configured for this view.

03 / John’s sales brain, memory & human handoff

The approved knowledge and decision boundaries behind every conversation.

Approved corpusCalls + FAQsJohn’s sales brainCurrent offer factsConversation memoryQuestions + next stepControlled toolsGHL + calendarHuman teamUncertainty + takeoverHuman feedback updates approved knowledge and conversation ownership
Local architecture illustration · Whimsical embed is not configured for this view.

04 / GoHighLevel synchronization & team operations

One operating CRM, clear sender ownership and visible exceptions.

Meta + phoneIntake + conversationCustom orchestrationOne message ownerGoHighLevelInbox + pipelineTeam dashboardContext + exceptionsJohn / closerReview + takeoverReadback, receipts and suppression reconcile the shared lead state
Local architecture illustration · Whimsical embed is not configured for this view.
What we will build

Specific workflows.
Clear proof of completion.

Open each flow for its trigger, owner, data, action, exceptions, client inputs and acceptance evidence. The new website and source-led working company branding guide form a separate deliverable. Five core flows connect engagement and appointments; reactivation is staged. Two foundation specifications define approved knowledge and team control.

01
New website scope

A bespoke investor website and consultation front door

A separate deliverable: a clear investor story, John's presentation, consultation path and source-led working company branding guide.

“we don't want people showing up blind.”John · Oct 1, 33:34 · meeting reference
Trigger
A prospective investor arrives from an approved Meta campaign, direct link or returning visit. Existing investors receive a clear path to the Avestor portal.
Owner
John approves offer facts/assets; CJ owns campaign context; AI Acrobatics designs/builds the website; the sales team owns human consultations and downstream investor decisions.
Data
Approved current brand/offer, dated source pack, real authorized assets, Vimeo 1185193132, consultation agenda, agreed fit wording and permitted visitor/lead attribution.
Actions
Present one coherent offer, the 12:08 video, readable fund/operator/retail roles, approved three-stage explanation and dated proof. Provide a working company branding guide using observed source materials and a pizza-derived red/ink/white direction; use Forno Street Pizza Co as the selected review brand and confirm current offer/legal identity before client launch. It is a proposed working guide, not a certified official brand manual. Offer question-first or consultation-first paths; connect tested GHL capture/booking when separately configured. Preserve Avestor for documents and transactions.
Exceptions & human review
Unapproved/inconsistent numbers, old dates or unsupported location/team claims stay out of prospect-facing copy. Use approved assets or clearly labeled concept illustrations. Concept artwork is not evidence of real locations or operations; Forno brand marks identify the selected company; any location photography still requires source, usage and currentness approval and is not assumed to prove operating status. A booking/provider failure shows a useful human fallback. No website transaction, eligibility decision or investor commitment is automated.
Acceptance evidence
Review the /investor prototype, /investor/brand-guide and connected fictional journey. Confirm source/material provenance and current brand identity in the working guide. Before client launch: approve facts/assets; test responsive/reload/video access, keyboard/readability, question capture, consent, actual GHL booking/readback, attribution and the correct Avestor handoff. Record measured performance rather than claiming a pass from a mockup.
Client inputs & dependencies. Expanded website scope, exact quote, schedule, owner-approved model/terms, media rights, real photos, current availability, GHL access and Avestor links. The original approximate 15,000 core-build discussion does not establish a price for this added deliverable; expanded total is TBD.
02
Core

A new Meta lead gets a useful next step

Preserve the form context and create a clear path into the first conversation.

“giving people a chance to call in immediately after opting in is a huge.”CJ · Oct 1, 00:24 · meeting reference
Trigger
A new lead submits the designated Forno Street Pizza Co Meta form. Imports and unrelated contacts do not trigger this flow.
Owner
Native Meta/GHL intake creates the CRM record; the selected native/custom coordinator owns the agreed AI cohort and next-step state.
Data
GHL contact ID, available form/Page/source identifiers, qualification answers, channel consent and assigned owner. Missing ad IDs remain unknown.
Actions
Map the form answers, link the correct GHL contact, evaluate the approved qualification rules, and present the tested phone path or agreed fallback. Start only the authorized follow-up.
Exceptions & human review
Unmatched or duplicate contacts, missing consent and ambiguous qualification route to review. A failed mobile call CTA falls back to the approved phone/link path.
Acceptance evidence
Submit a real test lead from the actual form on mobile; verify the right GHL record, preserved answers/source and one eligible enrollment. Replayed events produce no duplicate outreach.
Client inputs & dependencies. John/CJ provide Meta Page/form access, GHL location access, approved qualification thresholds and a current workflow inventory. Current brand/offer, minimum and eligibility need written approval: the supplied page, legacy interview and meeting may describe different offer versions. Do not blend their terms.
03
Core

An inbound call becomes an informed conversation

Answer timely questions using John's approved sales knowledge, then route the right next step.

“That's my biggest worry is that people are getting turned off by it.”CJ · Oct 1, 11:02 · meeting reference
Trigger
A prospect calls the configured, client-approved phone number after opt-in or through an agreed campaign entry.
Owner
The native GHL or custom voice runtime selected by scenario tests runs the approved assistant; John or the designated closer owns human judgment and escalation.
Data
Caller identity matched to GHL where possible, authorized call context, approved offer-pack version, exact questions and stated qualification information. This is not final eligibility or suitability verification.
Actions
Introduce the assistant clearly, answer supported questions, capture interest and open questions, offer booking or human handoff, and write a concise conversation brief back to the linked record.
Exceptions & human review
Unknown callers are verified without speculative matching. Current minimum, eligibility, location/allocation, financial personalization, listing-status and commitment questions go to a human when not supported by the approved pack. Conflicting or stale source claims are blocked; the handoff includes the exact question and source version. Provider failure uses the approved transfer/fallback route.
Acceptance evidence
Complete real phone tests for known/unknown caller, supported/unknown questions, interruption and human handoff. Verify linked GHL history and no unapproved claims; review voice latency and tone with John.
Client inputs & dependencies. Client-owned number/routing, provider access, approved voice and introduction, recording policy, current FAQs/corpus and escalation coverage. No paid voice service has been activated by this proposal.
04
Core

Follow-up remembers the conversation

Replace repetitive link-only messages with relevant, bounded SMS and email touchpoints.

“take the feedback, maybe the questions that they asked”CJ · Oct 1, 10:27 · meeting reference
Trigger
An eligible lead finishes a conversation without booking, or replies with a question during an agreed follow-up window.
Owner
One agreed sender owns each conversation across native GHL workflows, the assistant and manual sales replies.
Data
Linked conversation history, approved channel tone, unresolved questions, next step, consent/DND, timezone and current ownership.
Actions
Draft or send the authorized contextual touch, continue replies from shared memory, add approved supporting content, and record message IDs/status in GHL and the dashboard.
Exceptions & human review
Opt-out, takeover or a changed lead state cancels queued sends. Missing delivery receipts remain unresolved. Questions beyond the approved sales corpus enter the human queue.
Acceptance evidence
Demonstrate a phone-to-text reply that retains context, an email variant in approved tone, opt-out/takeover suppression and retry replay without duplicate messages. Confirm GHL shows the conversation.
Client inputs & dependencies. Approved John text/email examples, sender/domain configuration, consent rules, cadence and message ownership. Existing reminders/native AI must be reviewed to prevent overlap.
05
Core

Book once. Prepare both sides.

Use actual calendar availability and help the prospect arrive with the right context.

“place an appointment on my calendar or my closers calendar and they show up.”John · Oct 1, 21:59 · meeting reference
Trigger
A qualified prospect requests a sales appointment or agrees to an offered next step.
Owner
GHL calendars remain authoritative; the selected native/custom coordinator coordinates booking, while John/the closer owns the sales appointment.
Data
Correct calendar/closer IDs, live free slots, prospect timezone, client-approved intake details, prior questions, approved offer/asset version and optional self-reported preparation state: not started, part watched, finished or questions.
Actions
Offer valid slots, check availability, create one appointment, read it back, coordinate confirmation, offer relevant approved preparation without making viewing a booking condition, capture optional self-reported progress/questions, and prepare a closer brief with exact unresolved questions and source version.
Exceptions & human review
Slot conflict prompts another valid choice. Missing calendar/provider data goes to review. Confirmed playback signals are separate from self-report and only appear if implemented and verified later. Viewing never establishes understanding or qualification. No 75% gate or automatic cancellation for non-viewing is proposed.
Acceptance evidence
Book a real valid slot once on the correct closer calendar; verify timezone, persistence/readback, one confirmation and the brief. Test conflict, reschedule and reload paths.
Client inputs & dependencies. Calendar/rep routing rules, the intended 12:08 Fast Fired Phase 2 Presentation by John Humphrey (Vimeo 1185193132), current owner approval and optional chapter/message approval, preparation content, booking fields and coordinated notification workflows. Attendance is measured in the pilot, not promised.
06
Core

A missed appointment gets a considered recovery

Acknowledge the missed connection and offer a suitable next step without conflicting reminders.

“lately we're finding it like it's 25%.”John · Oct 1, 31:36 · meeting reference
Trigger
The agreed appointment status/window identifies a no-show after the team has recorded the outcome.
Owner
The sales team owns attendance status; the assistant follows the approved recovery policy and yields when a closer takes over.
Data
Appointment and contact IDs, confirmed attendance status, prior questions, existing outreach, owner and consent.
Actions
Send a brief contextual check-in, offer actual rescheduling availability, maintain the existing conversation and surface persistent issues to the team.
Exceptions & human review
Unknown attendance does not enroll automatically. Existing manual contact, opt-out or negative response stops the sequence. No-show status is not inferred from absent video telemetry.
Acceptance evidence
Test a known no-show, rescheduling, manual takeover and suppression. Confirm one coordinated recovery sequence and accurate original/rebooked appointment history.
Client inputs & dependencies. Reliable attendance status updates, grace window, cadence, approved copy and closer ownership. John's roughly 25% figure is a client-reported snapshot, not an audited baseline or target.
07
Staged option

Revisit an eligible historical cohort

A small, separately approved reactivation pilot for contacts who can appropriately be approached.

“I think having this as a re. Engagement campaign would actually be incredible, honestly.”CJ · Oct 1, 07:58 · meeting reference
Trigger
John/CJ approve a bounded historical contact cohort, its outreach basis and the pilot sequence.
Owner
The client approves eligibility and exclusions; the selected native/custom coordinator executes only the authorized cohort with one message owner.
Data
Contact age/source, consent, DND, existing relationship and ownership, prior context, exclusion reason and campaign membership.
Actions
Validate the cohort, reconcile current status, review example messages, run a limited pilot and report responses, offered/booked slots and opt-outs with defined denominators.
Exceptions & human review
Ambiguous consent, prior opt-outs, active sales ownership or stale offer details exclude the lead. Failures or unfavorable responses pause the cohort for review.
Acceptance evidence
Review sample inclusions/exclusions; prove no outreach to suppressed contacts, no duplicate enrollment and reliable receipt/opt-out handling before any wider activation.
Client inputs & dependencies. Approved list, consent evidence, current offer, exclusion policy, batch limits and human review. Historical reactivation is a staged option; final inclusion/price requires the SOW.
08
Foundation

Compile and approve John's sales knowledge

A bounded, current business corpus behind voice and written answers.

“We have tons of Zoom calls that I've done with clients over the last nine months.”John · Oct 1, 13:21 · meeting reference
Trigger
John supplies authorized recordings, current offer materials, FAQs and approved channel examples for this one offer.
Owner
John or the named content approver owns factual/tone approval; AI Acrobatics compiles, versions and tests the business corpus.
Data
Authorized/redacted recordings, cited current offer facts, approved answers, channel tone samples, source dates and approval/version state. The current page, intended 12:08 presentation, legacy interview and 2026 meeting are separate registry entries, not one blended truth source. Personal context is excluded.
Actions
Extract recurring questions and approved talk tracks, organize source-backed knowledge, review samples with John, and make only the approved offer-pack version available to the assistant. Approve brand, minimum, eligibility, projections, live locations/listing status and asset identity; preserve conflicting/retired entries for provenance rather than answering from them.
Exceptions & human review
Stale, contradictory or unapproved claims are blocked and surfaced to the content owner with the exact question, conflicting source and version. Investment judgment or a question without an approved answer routes to the human team.
Acceptance evidence
Review a versioned FAQ/tone set with John. Test supported, unknown and conflicting questions across voice/text; verify provenance and that unsupported content is not presented as fact.
Client inputs & dependencies. Corpus permissions, redaction/retention rules, current offer/qualification facts, John's review availability and an agreed process for future changes.
09
Foundation

Give the team visibility and control

A custom JuliBoop-inspired operator view linked to the authoritative GHL record.

“prove this out with this one offer that we have with Fast Fired.”John · Oct 1, 30:07 · meeting reference
Trigger
A lead, message, appointment, receipt or exception changes state, or an authorized team member opens a lead to review/take over.
Owner
The client team owns intervention and attendance status; the agreed operator workspace provides synchronized visibility and enforces the agreed conversation ownership.
Data
Linked GHL IDs, approved lead context, readiness/next step, self-reported preparation versus any separately confirmed player signal, approved pack/asset version, message and appointment receipts, handoff status, failure queue and defined funnel event denominators.
Actions
Show lead context and next actions, open the underlying CRM record, expose failures and unresolved questions, allow authorized review/takeover, and measure offered/booked/confirmed/attended events by cohort.
Exceptions & human review
Unknown or unreconciled status stays visibly unresolved. Failed sync enters the queue. Role restrictions protect access; takeover suppresses pending assistant actions rather than relying on a dashboard badge alone.
Acceptance evidence
Verify the linked GHL record, representative failure visibility and role access. Demonstrate takeover suppression and state persistence after refresh, mobile layout and reload. Reconcile dashboard counts to the agreed event definitions.
Client inputs & dependencies. Named team roles, GHL access/mapping, attendance updates, reporting windows/denominators, consent/retention rules and escalation owners. Primary pilot metric: attended first appointments per 100 eligible new Meta opt-ins; due-booked show rate is secondary. Definitions/windows must match the baseline. No uplift claim or target is established.
The delivery path

Build the journey.
Then prove it with a pilot.

The discussed two-week path is conditional on current source/answer approval, native/custom validation, access and journey acceptance. The pilot measures attended appointments without an invented uplift target.

Primary pilot outcome

Attended first appointments
per 100 eligible Meta opt-ins.

Define one new-lead enrollment cohort, eligibility, observation window and attendance source. Reconcile stable lead/appointment IDs and counts. Future appointments are not no-shows.

Supporting measures & quality guardrails

Secondary: attendance among due booked appointments; meaningful replies, response latency, booking completion, question resolution and preparation delivery.

Guardrails: incorrect/unsupported facts, wrong match/calendar, duplicate actions, opt-outs/complaints, unsuppressed sends, sync failures and human escalation.

Run small tests sequentially. No fixed target or uplift promise; changing ads/offer versions remain visible. Website visitor/cohort attribution is defined separately.

Baseline context to verify before the pilot

~25% recent show-upJohn · Oct 1, 31:36. Client snapshot; obtain due/attended counts and dates.

5–10 estimated calls/dayCJ · Oct 1 meeting. Sizing estimate, not a measured cohort.

Thousands of old leadsCJ · Oct 1, 07:52. Separate eligible reactivation pilot only.

WEEK 01 · PROPOSED

Approve the facts. Prove the fit.

Prepare a dated offer pack and test native GHL and custom candidates against the same representative scenarios before committing to the runtime.

Entry gate
Signed SOW/kickoff and settled commercial scope; designated GHL/Meta access; named factual approver and human owner; authorized source corpus.
Work
Resolve brand/offer, minimum, eligibility, projections and current locations/listing facts; approve answer boundaries and tone. Approve the intended 12:08 presentation and optional chapters/templates. Inventory reminders and compare native/custom call, context, booking and handoff scenarios. After the fit gate, build the approved phone/GHL context, contextual follow-up, calendar path, closer brief and operator controls; progress the separate investor website in parallel against its approved scope.
Exit gate
John approves the dated offer pack and answer/template set; the simplest candidate that passes the scenario gate is documented, and the approved core journey works in the authorized test environment. Website review has its own design/source acceptance gate and schedule.
Evidence
Source registry and approval/version record; implemented core journey demo and receipts; supported/unknown/conflicting-question tests; caller identity match, phone-to-text context, correct-calendar booking, consent/suppression, human handoff and failure visibility.
Fallback
Unresolved offer facts stay blocked. If native GHL passes, use it for the runtime and scope custom work to verified needs. Missing asset/access keeps the journey in test or a narrower human-reviewed pilot; the expanded website schedule is finalized separately.
WEEK 02 · PROPOSED

Refine the journey. Run a bounded pilot.

Validate core flows and preparation boundaries, then measure attended appointments with agreed cohorts and quality guardrails.

Entry gate
Approved offer/answer version; selected native/custom setup passes; identities/providers/consent and suppression verified; optional preparation chapter/template approved; named pilot approver and human escalation coverage.
Work
Complete retries/deduplication, opt-out/takeover, no-show and booking-change tests; verify self-report versus any implemented telemetry; test mobile/reload; train human review/release and publish the closer brief. Launch only the approved cohort.
Exit gate
Representative journey and handoff evidence is accepted; primary/secondary denominators reconcile; a bounded pilot proceeds with monitoring, touch caps, pause/rollback and a review point.
Evidence
Actual intake, message and appointment receipts; no critical factual/matching/calendar failure in the scripted set; suppressed sends and handoff proof; attended per 100 eligible opt-ins and attendance among due bookings, with explicit dates.
Fallback
Unresolved provider, knowledge, suppression or acceptance issues keep the system in test or pause the pilot. No broad activation or increased touch volume merely because bookings or video views rise.
October 14, 2026 was the proposed core-system target discussed with John. Confirm it at kickoff against access, approved assets, provider readiness and acceptance. The timeline is conditional. The expanded investor website has a separate scope and schedule to finalize; a narrower pilot or revised date may be needed. No fixed delivery date, booking uplift, attendance or revenue guarantee is offered.
Agent roles

Two focused business agents.
A personal version if chosen.

The operating roles below share approved context and handoffs, but have distinct permissions. The personal version is an optional, separately scoped choice.

01 / CORE ROLE

Business & marketing operations

Gives John and the team a clear view of new leads, conversation status, booking readiness and campaign follow-through across the approved Forno offer.

Input
Mapped Meta leads, GHL pipeline and calendar events, approved offer knowledge and team instructions.
Action
Prepare lead briefs, flag stalled or missed conversations, suggest next actions and coordinate approved nurture with one message owner.
Control & proof
Human review for offer changes, exceptions and spending decisions; demonstrate accurate GHL readback, suppression and owner takeover.
02 / CAMPAIGN ROLE

Ad 1 engagement agent

Handles the first designated Meta ad/form journey: qualified opt-in, immediate telephone entry, approved answers and the handoff to an attended sales call.

Input
Ad/form source, qualification answers, consent, caller identity and the current approved Forno source pack.
Action
Answer or route the inbound call, log questions, propose valid slots and pass a concise context brief to John or a closer.
Control & proof
Escalate unknown terms and unmatched callers; prove one lead record, one call history, valid booking and no duplicate follow-up on a real test ad.
OPTIONAL / SEPARATE SCOPE

Personal version for John

If John chooses it, adapt the same review-first assistant pattern for his personal scheduling, reminders and relationship follow-up outside the investor campaign.

Input
Only the personal accounts, contacts and preferences John explicitly connects and approves.
Action
Draft personal follow-ups, surface commitments and suggest calendar next steps for John to review.
Control & proof
Separate permissions, sender and data boundaries; no automatic reuse of investor records or personal outbound messages without approval.

The two business roles describe responsibilities, not two paid provider subscriptions by default. Exact included agent count, optimization hours and any personal-version build or ongoing fee belong in the final SOW.

Proposed investment

Original core reference.
Expanded scope priced separately.

The meeting’s approximate15,000 reference applies to the originally discussed core system. Currency and payment terms remain unconfirmed. The added investor website and expanded total require a new scope decision.

Original core-system discussion
~15,000 ONE-TIME BUILD REFERENCE

Approved source/answer preparation, tailored engagement coordination, closer context and representative acceptance testing for one offer. The native/custom fit gate determines the final runtime and exact custom scope.

Five core workflows outlined aboveApproved corpus and channel toneValidated native/custom voice path, memory and handoffGHL inbox / pipeline / calendar integrationOperator visibility for proven gaps and a controlled pilot

For Julian’s commercial review: exact amount, currency, payment/deposit milestones, ownership/license terms and included support are to be confirmed in the final SOW. The meeting did not establish these terms. Added website work is not silently included; its price and the expanded total are TBD.

Recurring service choices

Quoted monthly rates
for a 12-month commitment.

Annual-commitment pricing is shown below. Choose one defined support scope; these are separate from the one-time build.

Phone backend management

Provider maintenance and operational support, with coverage and incident boundaries agreed separately.

~1,500 / month12-month commitment rate · currency, coverage and billing terms TBC

Agent management

Ongoing agent care and optimization. Included agents, changes, hours and support boundaries need a defined scope.

from ~2,400 / month12-month commitment rate · currency, included agents and coverage TBC

Fractional CTO & development

Broader consulting and approved development work, depending on the agreed allocation of dev hours.

~2,500+ / month12-month commitment rate · currency, dev hours and change process TBC

The quoted monthly rates above are the 12-month commitment baseline. Each shorter commitment step increases the monthly rate by 20%: 6 months, then 3 months, then month-to-month. These are indicative calculations from the discussed approximate rates; currency, billing schedule and final SOW amounts remain to be confirmed. The scopes are optional choices, not a required stack of subscriptions. Provider credits/subscriptions are separate: phone, messaging, AI, hosting and any optional video/provider service need client-approved quotes, payer and usage caps.

Choose the commitment that fits.

The 12-month monthly quote is the most discounted. Each shorter step adds 20% to the preceding monthly rate; prices do not rise during the selected term. One-time build and website fees are separate.

12 MONTHSQuoted baseline

Largest discount · about 42% below month-to-month.

Phone backend
~1,500 / mo
Agent management
from ~2,400 / mo
Fractional CTO
~2,500+ / mo
6 MONTHS+20% / month

About 31% below month-to-month.

Phone backend
~1,800 / mo
Agent management
from ~2,880 / mo
Fractional CTO
~3,000+ / mo
3 MONTHS+20% vs 6 months

About 17% below month-to-month.

Phone backend
~2,160 / mo
Agent management
from ~3,456 / mo
Fractional CTO
~3,600+ / mo
MONTH TO MONTH+20% vs 3 months

Flexible standard monthly rate.

Phone backend
~2,592 / mo
Agent management
from ~4,147.20 / mo
Fractional CTO
~4,320+ / mo

Illustrative monthly rates use the approximate 12-month discussion figures and compound by 1.20 at each step. Discount percentages compare each option with month-to-month and are rounded. Currency, included hours/agents, billing terms and exact amounts require final SOW approval; these optional support scopes are not automatically combined.

Added investor website: quote TBD.Bespoke story, intended video, readable structure, consultation path, Avestor handoff and a source-led working company branding guide. Final design/assets, integration, schedule and total fee will be confirmed in the expanded SOW.
Staged options — confirm inclusion and price before expanding scope.Eligible historical-lead reactivation · Project Blue iMessage path with standard messaging fallback · tracked video readiness · outbound calling. Each needs its own account/policy validation. No guaranteed iMessage delivery or automatic video-threshold cancellation.
After launch & scope boundaries

A clear operating agreement
keeps the system useful.

The final SOW will define support, escalation, changes and ownership. These boundaries protect the approved website and one-offer pilot and the team’s sales process.

Care, support & next improvements.

Define a defect-correction window separately from provider maintenance, usage charges and optimization. Agree human coverage, escalation contacts, response expectations and the change-approval process before launch; no SLA or included hours have been agreed.

  • Train the team to read context, review exceptions and take over.
  • Review pilot results with defined lead, booking, confirmation and attendance denominators.
  • Approve new prompts, workflows, providers and larger cohorts through controlled changes.
  • Confirm client data, custom deliverables, pre-existing know-how and third-party license terms in the SOW.

Outside this initial build.

Your team handles investor closing, onboarding, final accreditation, contracts, funding and investment judgment after the appointment. The assistant uses only current, approved facts.

  • Full CRM migration/replacement, ad campaign or rebrand execution.
  • Financial/legal recommendations or performance guarantees.
  • Facial/personality inference and social/dating scraping; a personal assistant requires its own approved scope and separate data boundaries.
  • Unapproved bulk outreach, a personal sender or hidden assistant identity.
  • Other offers and unscoped new development; the optional personal version is only built if selected and priced in the SOW.
Prepared for your review

Let’s agree on the scope
before we turn it on.

Julian reviews this exact proposal first. After client review, the confirmed scope, commercial terms, inputs and acceptance gates become the final SOW. A reply here expresses a preference; it does not activate providers, sign an agreement or send this proposal to John.

Prepared by Julian Bradley · julian@aiacrobatics.com · +1 (619) 509-0699 · AI Acrobatics